DETERMINING THE QUALITY OF FIRE INVESTIGATION BASED ON CONGETIVE MODELING
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The issues related to the qualitative performance of the employee of the body of inquiry in the investigation of fires are considered. The fundamental factors influencing the quality of fire investigation are presented. The author believes that within the framework of making a management decision, when determining the optimal number of investigators of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, it is necessary to take into account the factor (indicator) of the quality of fire investigation. A causal graph of the cognitive model of the influence of fundamental factors on the quality of fire investigation has been developed. A fuzzy cognitive matrix (adjacency matrix) of fire investigation quality parameters is presented. The analytical data presented in the matrix allows us to form weight criteria for the degree of influence of factors on the quality of fire investigation, as well as their interrelationships. The use of the results of cognitive modeling in determining the quality indicators of fire investigation is one of the tools in the management decision support system of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Russian Federation in predicting the optimal human resource provision of the investigative body of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Russian Federation. The results developed in the course of the study can be used in the development of a methodology for determining the structural and staffing levels of territorial units of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia

Keywords:
fire safety, fire, inquirer, investigator, fire investigation, number of employees, quality of fire investigation, cognitive modeling
Text
Text (RU) (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Skripko G.A., Fedorov A.N., Mihaylova L.L. Problemy nizkoy raskryvaemosti prestupleniy, svyazannyh s lesnymi pozharami. V sbornike: Novye podhody k podgotovke naseleniya v oblasti zaschity ot chrezvychaynyh situaciy. Sbornik trudov sekcii No 21 i No 23. Materialy HHXIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Himki, 2023. S. 79-85. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UVXLQG

2. Fedorov G.V. Osobennosti vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del i planirovanie rassledovaniya kriminal'nyh pozharov. Vestnik Polockogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2011. No 6. S. 146-149. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ULYNGZ

3. Silov V.B. Prinyatie strategicheskih resheniy v nechetkoy obstanovke. - M.: INPRO-RES, 1995. - 228 s. [Silov, V.B. Prinjatie strategicheskih reshenij v nechetkoj obstanovke. M.: INPRO-RES, 1995. - 228 s. (In Russian)].

4. Maksimov V. I., Kornoushenko E. K. Analiticheskie osnovy primeneniya kognitivnogo podhoda pri reshenii slabostrukturirovannyh zadach.//Trudy IPU, 1998. vyp. 2.

5. Kornoushenko E. K., Maksimov V. I. Upravlenie processami v slaboformalizovannyh sredah pri stabilizacii grafovyh modeley sredy.//Trudy IPU, 1998. vyp. 2.

6. Podvesovskiy A.G., Lagerev D.G., Korostelev D.A., Isaev R.A. SPPR "IGLA". Sistema podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy "Intellektual'nyy Generator Luchshih Al'ternativ". Svidetel'stvo o gosudarstvennoy registracii programmy dlya EVM No2019617828. Zareg. 20.06.2019.

7. Kulinich A. A. Sistema kognitivnogo modelirovaniya "KANVA"// Programmnye produkty i sistemy. - 2002. - No 3. - S. 25-28. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JVSRIB

8. Karpov S.Yu. Model' deyatel'nostnoy nagruzki doznavatelya pri rassledovanii pozharov. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2022. T. 13. No 3. S. 88-106. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AXASNG DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0461-2022-13-3-88-106

9. Klimov E. A. Psihologiya professional'nogo samoopredeleniya. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 1996. 512 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QXIENF

10. Karpov S.Yu., Prus Yu.V. Model' prognozirovaniya prodolzhitel'nosti sbora pervonachal'noy informacii na meste pozhare funkciey Kobba-Duglasa. Tehnologii tehnosfernoy bezopasnosti. 2020. No 1 (87). S. 93-106. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HDKMSG DOI: https://doi.org/10.25257/TTS.2020.1.87.93-106

11. Abakarov A.Sh., Sushkov Yu.A. Programmnaya sistema podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy "MPRIORITY 1.0". Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal "ISSLEDOVANO V ROSSII". http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2005/207.pdf.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?